The essential difference between a loan without recourse and a recourse loan has to do with the assets that a lender can pursue if the borrower does not pay the loan.
In both types of loans, the lender can take possession of any asset that has been used as collateral to guarantee the loan. In most cases, the guarantee is the asset that was purchased for the loan. For example, both in recourse and non-recourse mortgages, the lender could seize and sell the house to pay off the loan if the borrower fails.
Differences between loans without recourse and loans of recourse
The distinction comes into play if the debt money is still owed after the guarantee has been sold. In a resource mortgage, the lender can go in search of the other assets of the borrower or demand that his salary be garnished, basically, everything must be completed. However, in a mortgage without recourse, the lender is out of luck. If the asset is not sold for at least what the borrower owes, the lender must absorb the difference and leave; You are not entitled to any other fund or source of financing from the lender.
Borrowers almost always favor loans without recourse, while lenders almost always favor loans with recourse.
While prospective borrowers may find it attractive not to pay loans without recourse, it is important to remember that they come with higher interest rates and are reserved for individuals and businesses with the best credit. In addition, failure to pay a debt without recourse may leave the other assets of the borrower intact, but the default is still in the record, with all that that implies for the borrower’s credit rating.
This is that while the lender may not be able to go after your personal assets on a non-recourse loan, keep in mind that the default will still have a negative effect on your credit history.
Your credit score will get severely worse and the news of a recent default will probably make it impossible for you to get a loan. A stain like this can also have a negative effect on your professional career.